Taperman articles

Why a Yahoo News Corp. Deal Makes Sense News Corp. is reportedly talking to Yahoo about an arrangement that would look a lot like a joint venture. It’s unclear how these talks will play out, but the structure of the deal is far superior to Microsoft’s proposed integration go-round. The Wall Street Journal, AP and others have all followed blog reports from TechCrunch and Silicon Alley Insider noting that News Corp. is talking to Yahoo about a deal (see Techmeme). This deal would leave Rupert Murdoch with a 20 percent of Yahoo. News Corp. would toss in the Fox Interactive properties"MySpace, AmericanIdol.com and others"and some cash with a private equity player to get a beefed up Yahoo. The more I think about this arrangement the better it sounds. Here’s why: Yahoo would have clarity of mission. If this News Corp. deal were consummated Yahoo would become what it’s supposed to be"a media company. Yahoo is a sort-of-technology company, but it’s no Google. Microsoft would give Yahoo technology, but not the type it wants. Almost instantly you’d have a Windows (Microsoft) vs. open source (Yahoo) on the backend technical infrastructure. Who needs those religious wars? Yahoo is about entertainment, splashing American Idol on Yahoo.com and being a mainstream network. A joint venture would be more nimble. Let’s face it a Microsoft-Yahoo deal would take years to get right. There would be integration squabbles. Meanwhile, Google would grab more market share. I can understand the deal. Ok, I understand the concept of clean teams and all of that other integration mumbo jumbo from covering the Hewlett-Packard-Compaq merger. But those moving parts are messy. This deal is simple"swap some properties and cash and poof you’re done.

Author